Why Chile Turned Right

As darkness settled in central Chile on the 3rd day after the Great Quake of February 2010, residents wielding metal pipes on the outskirts of Los Ángeles placed wooden barriers to block intruders from entering their neighborhood. 

"We're trying to take care of the little we have here," said Ana Bedois, a 34 year-old mother of three infants. "We're here all night, first the mothers then the fathers".

Hobbesian Order

Thomas Hobbes once wrote that without Order imposed by higher authorities, people tend to act "without restraint" in order to dominate their neighbors. When this occurs, there is:

"no Industry... no Culture... no Knowledge... no Arts; no Letters; no Society; and worst of all, continuall feare and danger of violent death; and the life of man (is) solitary, poore, nasty, brutish and short."

And so in Chile, for a few short yet interminable days, restraint had broken down.

Merely Economic?

Many claim that Chile suffered from deep-rooted poverty and injustice, which explains, at least in part, why so many disaffected people broke into their neighbors' homes.

But the resulting turmoil seemed to be about more than just poverty. It seemed to be about danger and disorder, the piercing discomfort that something like this could happen at any time not just here but in New York, Paris or Shanghai.

Curiously, Hobbes based his thinking on the assumption that dictators arise because people will do nearly anything to avoid living in fear. That's how he justified dictatorship, a quid pro quo of security for freedom.

In Chile, the Law in many towns broke down to two simple rights: the right to live free from attack and the right to defend oneself if this right was violated. 

So when power and phone lines went down in Concepción, many law-abiding citizens keenly felt the State's absence.

"If the government doesn't lay down a heavy hand soon" said one young mother, "the situation will soon get out of control".

In a word, this was about fear.

The Monster

In a place where many people remember what life was like under the junta, the military is a divisive symbol.

But something happened after the quake... not just about what Chileans thought about the Army, but what they thought about themselves.

In the days after the huge tremor - when aftershocks struck daily and city buildings buckled - people went to bed thinking about losing their possessions.

In towns like Arauco and Cañete - where the jolt had completely knocked out power and communication - residents prayed for the Army.

Just days before, they would have been unnerved by the sight of soldiers on the street.

The Bible

Much was exaggerated, the result of hysteria and panic; most people can't assimilate fear at such short notice. 

But many Chileans sensed, more starkly than ever before, nature's nasty and brutish undertones.

In the Book of Job, it says: 

"If you lay a hand on him

You will remember the struggle...

Any hope of subduing him is false;

The mere sight of him is overpowering...

When he rises, the mighty are terrified."

This terrible sea creature, Leviathan, also symbolized human nature or - put differently - who we often are in the absence of Order.

When Hobbes wrote Leviathan, his message was clear: we disobey this great force at our own peril.

Many Chileans recently had a "mere sight" of this force; it now appears the political consequences may be "overpowering" indeed.

 

Filed under  //   Chile   earthquake   Latin America   law and order   natural disaster   politics  

Comments [0]

The Temptation of Friendship: The Latin America Unity Summit

This week Latin American leaders were in Cancun for the Latin America Summit, a major gathering focused on Latin American affairs and featuring the Mexican president seated smack between Raul Castro and Hugo Chavez. 

Just before the meeting got under way, Mr. Chavez burst into the room with his left hand held high, shouting "Viva Mexico". Minutes later he approached Mr. Calderon with his arms open wide, singing at the top of his lungs México lindo y querido.

The Venezuelan leader then grabbed his Mexican counterpart by the lapels and smothered him in a friendly bear hug. 

Mr. Calderon was all smiles.

At long last, the sister Republics were together - a fraternity of 33 nations representing the largest geographical bloc in the world. And Mr. Calderon, the host, basked in the warmth and flavor that only a gathering of Latins and Caribeans could provide. 

Jorge Castaneda, Mexico's former foreign minister, commented that Mr. Calderon was finally in his mero mole

Gone from memory were the images Mr. Calderon used in his campaign to vilify Mr. Chavez (and win the presidency). Gone was the perennial power dispute between Brazil and Mexico. 

For Mexico is first and foremost a Latin nation - a land of hard-working merchants and festive markets; of pre-Hispanic ruins and sunny beaches and warm embraces. Latin America fervently needs Mexico... and Mexico is an historic part of Latin America.

Yet Mexico is also a hybrid, a country whose economic strength is firmly linked to its North American location. Without these links, would it really be thinkable to compare it to Brazil, an immense nation with a homegrown airplane industry and nuclear manufacturing facilities?

"Felipe!" exclaimed Lula da Silva before the two men embraced effusively. Mr. Calderon was ecstatic, swept by the camaraderie of his compatriots.

So when he later stood proudly to announce the formation of a new bloc of Latin and Caribbean nations that would exclude the US and Canada (and include Cuba), most commentators  - at least in Mexico - immediately interpreted it as an affront to his NAFTA partners. 

Yet images of Mr. Calderon - a conservative churchgoing Mexican - belied this image: he beamed self-confidence and bonhomie. Keep in mind that Mr. Calderon is a "friend" of the US - a stalwart ally in the fight against crime. 

What's wrong with this picture? I thought.

Where's Uncle Sam?

Today an article appeared in the NYT that described the gathering as a "diplomatic success". I could only think: "Brilliant!", the official announcement of a new block that excludes the U.S. made in America's backyard by a conservative U.S. ally. 

Which means that Mr. Calderon - with the backing of his North American partners - went to Cancun to "snub his nose" at the Anglos. 

In sum, he got his cake and ate it too, the perfect combination for a Mexican politician, a true believer in Friendship and Dialogue.

Perhaps for this reason, the Mexican leader felt in his mole: the back slaps, embraces, animated gestures and of course the warm body language that only Latins on a sunny beach could deliver. The "rude guys" from the south - Correa, Chavez, Evo and Ortega - were playing nice, at least for now.

"Today marks the day when Mexico," said Hugo Chavez "this profound, heroic nation, has given re-birth to Bolívar's great dream".

Mr. Calderon smiled broadly, firmly in his element.
Filed under  //   diplomacy   foreign relations   Latin America   Mexico   politics  

Comments [0]

About

Mine was a clamorous New York childhood spent on boardwalks and in delis between the south shore and the teeming Metropolis. Since childhood, I've strolled with Sicilians and strutted with Latins. Which explains nothing about life in a big Latin American metropolis. Cheers to a big world!